-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
[AzureFunctions] [Storage] Avoid swallowing exceptions when retrieving votes #53737
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
alrod
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
alrod/avoid-ex-storage
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -4,13 +4,14 @@ | |||
| using System; | ||||
| using System.Collections.Generic; | ||||
| using System.Linq; | ||||
| using System.Threading.Tasks; | ||||
| using System.Threading; | ||||
| using System.Threading.Tasks; | ||||
| using Azure; | ||||
| using Azure.Core.TestFramework; | ||||
| using Azure.Storage.Queues; | ||||
| using Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions.Storage.Common.Listeners; | ||||
| using Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions.Storage.Common.Tests; | ||||
| using Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Host.Listeners; | ||||
|
||||
| using Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Host.Listeners; |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removing exception handling from
GetQueueLengthAsync()andGetMetricsAsync()changes the API contract in a breaking way. Callers likeQueueTargetScaler.GetScaleResultAsync()that previously received a default value (0) during transient errors will now experience exceptions. This could cause scaling operations to fail instead of gracefully degrading. Consider whether callers are prepared to handle exceptions for transient storage issues like queue not found, queue being deleted, or server-side errors.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do kinda agree with this but at the same time, if I recall correctly, if an exception is thrown in webjobs then it will actually emit errors to application insights actually and not tear down the entire application. @alrod @mathewc Could you help my understanding here? Just want to make sure we don't cause a breaking behavior change with this.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it's not clear to me either whether changing these contracts across all the extensions won't be breaking. As it stands, when any of these monitors/scalers can't provide metrics, they return default/empty metrics but don't throw.
The client of these APIs is not only ScaleManager but also ScaleMonitorService for runtime driven scale. Are there any other callers of these APIs that might not be prepared to handle exceptions? We need to carefully verify.
Yes, this is a risky change to make across all these extensions. I don't understand - why won't these error messages written to the supplied ILogger go to the customer's App Insights or other log streams? The logger should already be configured to do this.