11
22<p align =" center " >
33 <picture >
4- <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="./ assets/FlashTokenizer_main_dark.png">
5- <img alt="FlashTokenizer" src="./ assets/FlashTokenizer_main_light.png" width=60%>
4+ <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/FlashTokenizer_main_dark.png?raw=true ">
5+ <img alt="FlashTokenizer" src="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/FlashTokenizer_main_light.png?raw=true " width=60%>
66 </picture >
77</p >
88<h1 align =" center " >
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ FlashTokenizer is a high-performance tokenizer implementation in C++ of the Bert
2222
2323<p align =" center " >
2424 <picture >
25- <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="./ assets/Banner_dark.png">
26- <img alt="Banner" src="./ assets/Banner_light.png" width=100%>
25+ <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/Banner_dark.png?raw=true ">
26+ <img alt="Banner" src="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/Banner_light.png?raw=true " width=100%>
2727 </picture >
2828</p >
2929
@@ -194,8 +194,8 @@ Both libraries are faster to return as `np.ndarray`. Perhaps the implementations
194194
195195<p align =" center " >
196196 <picture >
197- <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="./ assets/BatchTest_dark.png">
198- <img alt="batchtest" src="./ assets/BatchTest_light.png" width=100%>
197+ <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/BatchTest_dark.png?raw=true ">
198+ <img alt="batchtest" src="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/BatchTest_light.png?raw=true " width=100%>
199199 </picture >
200200</p >
201201
@@ -242,15 +242,15 @@ The `flash-tokenizer`, which I implemented because I didn't like the other token
242242
243243<p align =" center " >
244244 <picture >
245- <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="./ assets/TokenizerPerformanceGraph_dark.png">
246- <img alt="FlashTokenizer" src="./ assets/TokenizerPerformanceGraph_light.png" width=100%>
245+ <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/TokenizerPerformanceGraph_dark.png?raw=true ">
246+ <img alt="FlashTokenizer" src="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/TokenizerPerformanceGraph_light.png?raw=true " width=100%>
247247 </picture >
248248</p >
249249
250250<p align =" center " >
251251 <picture >
252- <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="./ assets/TokenizerPerformanceBar_dark.jpg">
253- <img alt="FlashTokenizer" src="./ assets/TokenizerPerformanceBar_light.jpg" width=100%>
252+ <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/TokenizerPerformanceBar_dark.jpg?raw=true ">
253+ <img alt="FlashTokenizer" src="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/TokenizerPerformanceBar_light.jpg?raw=true " width=100%>
254254 </picture >
255255</p >
256256
@@ -269,8 +269,8 @@ erDiagram
269269
270270<p align =" center " >
271271 <picture >
272- <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="./ assets/WrongAnswer_dark.png">
273- <img alt="WA" src="./ assets/WrongAnswer_light.png" width=100%>
272+ <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/WrongAnswer_dark.png?raw=true ">
273+ <img alt="WA" src="https://github.com/NLPOptimize/flash-tokenizer/blob/main/ assets/WrongAnswer_light.png?raw=true " width=100%>
274274 </picture >
275275</p >
276276
0 commit comments