-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-54218][PYTHON][SQL][TESTS] Add integrated tests for Scalar Pandas Iterator UDF #52937
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…calar Pandas Iterator UDF" This reverts commit 81be5fb.
fedb012 to
d201425
Compare
|
cc @pan3793 |
|
@zhengruifeng do you have any modifications on this? the CI seems to be stable after your previous reverting. |
no, the PR is exactly the same as the previous one |
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, LGTM.
Since this is only for Apache Spark 4.2.0, we can merge this PR according to the PR builder's success result.
For the other CIs, we can monitor the stability.
|
thanks, merged to master |
|
@pan3793 @dongjoon-hyun Not sure why it is related to this PR, I cannot reproduce it in my local, I am going to revert it again... |
|
reverted in 21c3122 |
|
this MIGHT (not sure) indicate the VM gets killed due to OOM
|
|
That's too bad. Anyway, thank you for testing and reverting. |
Reapply #52916
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add integrated tests for Scalar Pandas Iterator UDF
Why are the changes needed?
to improve test coverage
Many UDF types are only tested in python side, and are missing in the SQL side. So
if the results (tested in python) are the same but the plan was unintentionally changed, we will not be aware of such change.
This PR adds SQL_SCALAR_PANDAS_ITER_UDF
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, test-only
How was this patch tested?
ci
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
no