|
| 1 | +import os |
| 2 | +import subprocess |
| 3 | +import unittest |
| 4 | +import pytest |
| 5 | +from parameterized import parameterized |
| 6 | +from main import get_policy_check_type, get_required_inputs, get_optional_inputs, get_sub_command |
| 7 | +from main import get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag, build_command, execute_command, set_output |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +from main import CLI_POLICY_VALIDATOR, POLICY_CHECK_TYPE, VALIDATE_POLICY, CHECK_NO_NEW_ACCESS, CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED |
| 10 | +from main import COMMON_REQUIRED_INPUTS, TREAT_FINDINGS_AS_NON_BLOCKING |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +from unittest.mock import patch |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +INVALID_POLICY_CHECK = "INVALID_POLICY_CHECK" |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +class TfpvTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| 17 | + # case 1: test_get_type_ENVIRON_NOT_SET: failure expected because required os.environ[] are not set |
| 18 | + def test_get_type_ENVIRON_NOT_SET(self): |
| 19 | + self.assertRaises(KeyError, get_policy_check_type) |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | + # case 2: test_get_type_INVALID_POLICY_CHECK: failure expected because os.environ[] is set to an invalid value |
| 22 | + def test_get_type_INVALID_POLICY_CHECK(self): |
| 23 | + os.environ[POLICY_CHECK_TYPE] = INVALID_POLICY_CHECK |
| 24 | + self.assertRaises(ValueError, get_policy_check_type) |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | + # case 3, 4, 5: test_get_type_WITH_VALIDATE_POLICY: success with valid POLICY_CHECK_TYPE |
| 27 | + @parameterized.expand([VALIDATE_POLICY, CHECK_NO_NEW_ACCESS, CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED]) |
| 28 | + def test_get_type_WITH_VALID_POLICY_CHECK(self, policy_check_type): |
| 29 | + os.environ[POLICY_CHECK_TYPE] = policy_check_type |
| 30 | + policy_type = get_policy_check_type() |
| 31 | + self.assertEqual(policy_type, policy_check_type) |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + # case 6: test_get_required_input_INVALID_POLICY_CHECK: failure expected because an invalid policy_check_type is provided |
| 34 | + @unittest.expectedFailure |
| 35 | + def test_get_required_input_INVALID_POLICY_CHECK(self): |
| 36 | + policy_check = INVALID_POLICY_CHECK |
| 37 | + self.assertEqual(get_required_inputs(policy_check), "") |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + # case 7, 8, 9: test_get_required_input_WITH_VALIDATE_POLICY: success as a valid POLICY_CHECK_TYPE is provided: VALIDATE_POLICY |
| 40 | + @parameterized.expand([VALIDATE_POLICY, CHECK_NO_NEW_ACCESS, CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED]) |
| 41 | + def test_get_required_input_WITH_VALID_POLICY_CHECK(self, policy_check_type): |
| 42 | + result = get_required_inputs(policy_check_type) |
| 43 | + if policy_check_type == VALIDATE_POLICY: |
| 44 | + self.assertEqual(result, {"INPUT_TEMPLATE-PATH", "INPUT_REGION"}) |
| 45 | + elif policy_check_type == CHECK_NO_NEW_ACCESS: |
| 46 | + self.assertEqual(result, {"INPUT_TEMPLATE-PATH", "INPUT_REGION", "INPUT_REFERENCE-POLICY", "INPUT_REFERENCE-POLICY-TYPE"}) |
| 47 | + else: |
| 48 | + self.assertEqual(result, {"INPUT_TEMPLATE-PATH", "INPUT_REGION", "INPUT_ACTIONS"}) |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | + # case 10: test_get_optional_input_INVALID_POLICY_CHECK: failure expected because an invalid policy_check_type is provided |
| 51 | + @unittest.expectedFailure |
| 52 | + def test_get_optional_input_INVALID_POLICY_CHECK(self): |
| 53 | + policy_check = INVALID_POLICY_CHECK |
| 54 | + result = get_optional_inputs(policy_check) |
| 55 | + assertEqual(result, {"INPUT_IGNORE-FINDING", "INPUT_ALLOW-DYNAMIC-REF-WITHOUT-VERSION", "INPUT_EXCLUDE-RESOURCE-TYPES"}) |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + # case 11, 12, 13: test_get_optional_input_WITH_VALID_POLICY_CHECK: success as a valid POLICY_CHECK_TYPE is provided |
| 58 | + @parameterized.expand([VALIDATE_POLICY, CHECK_NO_NEW_ACCESS, CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED]) |
| 59 | + def test_get_optional_input_WITH_VALID_POLICY_CHECK(self, policy_check_type): |
| 60 | + result = get_optional_inputs(policy_check_type) |
| 61 | + if policy_check_type == VALIDATE_POLICY: |
| 62 | + self.assertEqual(result, {"INPUT_ALLOW-EXTERNAL-PRINCIPALS", "INPUT_TREAT-FINDING-TYPE-AS-BLOCKING", "INPUT_IGNORE-FINDING", |
| 63 | + "INPUT_ALLOW-DYNAMIC-REF-WITHOUT-VERSION", "INPUT_EXCLUDE-RESOURCE-TYPES"}) |
| 64 | + elif policy_check_type == CHECK_NO_NEW_ACCESS: |
| 65 | + self.assertEqual(result, {"INPUT_IGNORE-FINDING", "INPUT_ALLOW-DYNAMIC-REF-WITHOUT-VERSION", "INPUT_EXCLUDE-RESOURCE-TYPES"}) |
| 66 | + else: |
| 67 | + self.assertEqual(result, {"INPUT_IGNORE-FINDING", "INPUT_ALLOW-DYNAMIC-REF-WITHOUT-VERSION", "INPUT_EXCLUDE-RESOURCE-TYPES"}) |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | + # case 14: test_get_sub_command_ENVIRON_NOT_SET: failure expected because required os.environ[]s are not set |
| 70 | + def test_get_sub_command_ENVIRON_NOT_SET(self): |
| 71 | + os.environ['INPUT_REGION'] = '' |
| 72 | + required = ['INPUT_REGION'] |
| 73 | + self.assertRaises(ValueError, get_sub_command, required, True) |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | + # case 15: test_get_sub_command_MEET_REQUIRED_INPUTS: success as valid inputs are provided. |
| 76 | + def test_get_sub_command_MEET_REQUIRED_INPUTS(self): |
| 77 | + tft = os.getcwd() + './main.py' |
| 78 | + os.environ['INPUT_TEMPLATE-PATH'] = tft |
| 79 | + os.environ['INPUT_REGION'] = 'us-west-2' |
| 80 | + required = {"INPUT_TEMPLATE-PATH", "INPUT_REGION"} |
| 81 | + expected = ['--template-path', tft, '--region', 'us-west-2'] |
| 82 | + flags = get_sub_command(required, True) |
| 83 | + self.assertEqual(set(flags), set(expected)) |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | + # case 16: test_get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag_ENVIRON_NOT_SET: failure expected because os.environ[TREAT_FINDINGS_AS_NON_BLOCKING] is not set |
| 86 | + def test_get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag_ENVIRON_NOT_SET(self): |
| 87 | + os.environ[TREAT_FINDINGS_AS_NON_BLOCKING] = '' |
| 88 | + policy_check = CHECK_NO_NEW_ACCESS |
| 89 | + self.assertRaises(ValueError, get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag, policy_check) |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | + # case 17: test_get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag_VALIDATE_POLICY: pass |
| 92 | + def test_get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag_VALIDATE_POLICY(self): |
| 93 | + policy_check = VALIDATE_POLICY |
| 94 | + result = get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag(policy_check) |
| 95 | + self.assertEqual(result, "") |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | + # case 18: test_get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag_CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED_True: pass, a string of flag returned |
| 98 | + def test_get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag_CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED_True(self): |
| 99 | + policy_check = CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED |
| 100 | + os.environ[TREAT_FINDINGS_AS_NON_BLOCKING] = 'True' |
| 101 | + result = get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag(policy_check) |
| 102 | + self.assertEqual(result, ['--treat-findings-as-non-blocking']) |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | + # case 19: test_get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag_CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED_False: pass, an empty string returned |
| 105 | + def test_get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag_CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED_False(self): |
| 106 | + policy_check = CHECK_ACCESS_NOT_GRANTED |
| 107 | + os.environ[TREAT_FINDINGS_AS_NON_BLOCKING] = 'False' |
| 108 | + result = get_treat_findings_as_non_blocking_flag(policy_check) |
| 109 | + self.assertEqual(result, "") |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | + # case 20: test_build_command_VALIDATE_POLICY: pass with correct parameters. |
| 112 | + def test_build_command_VALIDATE_POLICY(self): |
| 113 | + policy_check = VALIDATE_POLICY |
| 114 | + tft = os.getcwd() + './main.py' |
| 115 | + os.environ['INPUT_TEMPLATE-PATH'] = tft |
| 116 | + os.environ['INPUT_REGION'] = 'us-west-2' |
| 117 | + os.environ['TREAT_FINDINGS_AS_NON_BLOCKING'] = 'False' |
| 118 | + os.environ['INPUT_IGNORE-FINDING'] = 'PASS_ROLE_WITH_STAR_IN_RESOURCE' |
| 119 | + required = {"INPUT_TEMPLATE-PATH", "INPUT_REGION"} |
| 120 | + optional = {"INPUT_IGNORE-FINDING"} |
| 121 | + command = build_command(policy_check, required, optional) |
| 122 | + expected = set([CLI_POLICY_VALIDATOR, 'validate', '--template-path', tft, '--region', 'us-west-2', '--ignore-finding', 'PASS_ROLE_WITH_STAR_IN_RESOURCE']) |
| 123 | + command_set = set(command) |
| 124 | + self.assertEqual(command_set, expected) |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | + # case 21: test_execute_command_EXCEPTION: exception raised |
| 127 | + @patch("subprocess.run", side_effect=Exception("invalid-input")) |
| 128 | + def test_execute_command_EXCEPTION(self, mock_run): |
| 129 | + with pytest.raises(Exception) as exc: |
| 130 | + result = execute_command() |
| 131 | + assertNotEqual(str(exc.value).find("invalid-input"), -1) |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | + # case 21: test_execute_command_VALIDATE: pass with mockrun |
| 134 | + @patch("main.subprocess.run") |
| 135 | + def test_execute_command_VALIDATE(self, mock_run): |
| 136 | + command = [CLI_POLICY_VALIDATOR, 'validate'] |
| 137 | + expected = "pass" |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | + completed_process = subprocess.CompletedProcess(args=['command', 'args'], returncode=0, stdout=expected, stderr=b'error') |
| 140 | + mock_run.return_value = completed_process |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | + result = execute_command(command) |
| 143 | + self.assertEqual(result, expected) |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | + # case 23: test_set_output: pass |
| 146 | + def test_set_output_WRITE_TO_FILE(self): |
| 147 | + os.environ['GITHUB_OUTPUT'] = 'o1' |
| 148 | + val = '{"BlockingFindings": [],"NonBlockingFindings": []}' |
| 149 | + set_output(val) |
| 150 | + res = subprocess.run(["grep", "BlockingFindings", "o1"], check=True, capture_output=True, encoding="utf-8").stdout |
| 151 | + subprocess.run(["rm", "o1"]) |
| 152 | + self.assertNotEqual(res.find("BlockingFindings"), -1) |
| 153 | + |
0 commit comments