Bug: [EPRH] Adding multiple rules to eslint-disable-next-line along with noInlineConfig: true somehow doesn't report any errors

[ankitprahladsoni]

React version: 18

I had originally reported this in the ESLint repo, but they suggested it to move it here eslint/eslint#20344

Steps To Reproduce

1. Clone the repo https://github.com/ankitprahladsoni/eslint-noInlineConfig-bug
2. run npm run lint

The current behavior

Running npm run eslint results in 2 warnings

   8:5  warning  '// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps, react-hooks/set-state-in-effect' has no effect because you have 'noInlineConfig' setting in your config
  10:6  warning  React Hook useEffect has a missing dependency: 'count'. Either include it or remove the dependency array. You can also do a functional update 'setCount(c => ...)' if you only need 'count' in the 'setCount' call  react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

The expected behavior

ESLint should have thrown at least one error, since noInlineConfig is set to true. We can get it if we remove the inline config manually
8:5 error Error: Calling setState synchronously within an effect can trigger cascading renders

[MohammedKhalidMahmoud]

Hello @ankitprahladsoni , I ran 5 test cases to investigate the issue:

Case 1: No rules applied (removed inline comment) → problems 2 and 3 appeared.
Case 2: Rule 1 (react-hooks/exhaustive-deps) only → problems 1 and 2 appeared (problem 3 missing).
Case 3: Rule 2 (set-state-in-effect) only → problems 1, 2, and 3 appeared.
Case 4: Rule 1 + Rule 2 → problems 1 and 2 appeared (problem 3 missing).
Case 5: Rule 2 + Rule 1 → problems 1, 2, and 3 appeared.

Problems:

Using inline config comments

Missing dependencies in useEffect

Calling setState inside useEffect

Conclusion: Cases 2 and 4 fail because both rules are AST-based and applied on the same node. Rule 1 (exhaustive-deps) marks the useEffect node as visited, which prevents Rule 2 (set-state-in-effect) from detecting problem 3. The order of AST-based rules matters when multiple rules operate on the same nodes.