@@ -263,8 +263,8 @@ _Editor's note: Just like in our previous edition, we return with another
263263__ Various__
264264+ [ Highlights from Git 2.47] ( https://github.blog/open-source/git/highlights-from-git-2-47/ )
265265 by Taylor Blau on GitHub Blog. Includes features like incremental multi-pack indexes,
266- ` %(is-base:) ` atom for ` git for-each-ref ` , the new
267- “[ Platform Support Policy] ( https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.47.0/Documentation/technical/platform-support.txt ) ” document,
266+ ` %(is-base:) ` atom for ` git for-each-ref ` (see also the [ Brooke Kuhlmann article ] ( https://alchemists.io/articles/git_for_each_ref ) , mentioned below),
267+ the new “[ Platform Support Policy] ( https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.47.0/Documentation/technical/platform-support.txt ) ” document,
268268 ` git mergetool ` directly supporting Visual Studio Code merge tool, and others.
269269+ [ What's new in Git 2.47.0?] ( https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2024/10/07/whats-new-in-git-2-47-0/ )
270270 by Justin Tobler on GitLab Blog. Highlights include
@@ -285,13 +285,28 @@ __Light reading__
285285+ [ Using Git as Your Personal To-Do List] ( https://dev.to/munemprionto/using-git-as-your-personal-to-do-list-3kkd )
286286 by Munem Prionto on DEV\. to - more as a way of learning Git by the way of managing
287287 a TODO list, rather than for practical reasons.
288- + Contrast with [ Using Git to Manage Todos] (https://jezenthomas.com/2015/10/using-git-to-manage-todos/
288+ + Contrast with [ Using Git to Manage Todos] ( https://jezenthomas.com/2015/10/using-git-to-manage-todos/ )
289289 by Jezen Thomas (2015), mentioned in [ Git Rev News Edition #9 ] ( https://git.github.io/rev_news/2015/11/11/edition-9/ ) ,
290290 which is about using Git to help manage TODO or FIXME comments in the codebase
291291 (assuming that for example your IDE does not have a plugin for managing TODOs).
292292 + One can also consider using a CLI tool that stores data in plain text files
293293 for managing TODOs, like [ Taskwarrior] ( https://taskwarrior.org/ ) . Plain text
294294 files work well with Git.
295+ + [ Git For Each Ref] ( https://alchemists.io/articles/git_for_each_ref )
296+ by Brooke Kuhlmann in Alchemists Collective articles.
297+ Learn how to use this command to make use of references
298+ for information dumping, statistcs, and much more.
299+ Included in this article is use of the new ` is-base ` field name recently added in
300+ [ Git 2.47.0] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/git/git/master/Documentation/RelNotes/2.47.0.txt ) .
301+ + [ Searching for and navigating Git commits] ( https://alexharri.com/blog/searching-and-navigating-git-commits )
302+ by Alex Harri on his blog.
303+ + [ Why some of us like "interdiff" code review] ( https://gist.github.com/thoughtpolice/9c45287550a56b2047c6311fbadebed2 )
304+ by Austin Seipp (a Gist). Describes problems with the UI of multi-commit GitHub Pull Requests
305+ for responding to reviewer comments by provinding new version of patch series,
306+ and how ` git range-diff ` and interactive rebase can help with this task.
307+ + [ How I Review GitHub PRs] ( https://www.bitquabit.com/post/how-i-do-github-prs/ )
308+ by Benjamin Pollack on bitquabit.
309+
295310
296311+ [ Python PGP proposal poses packaging puzzles] ( https://lwn.net/Articles/993787/ )
297312 by Joe Brockmeier on LWN\. net - [ Sigstore] ( https://docs.sigstore.dev/ ) vs [ OpenPGP] ( https://www.openpgp.org/ ) .
@@ -300,18 +315,6 @@ __Light reading__
300315+ [ A look at the aerc mail client] ( https://lwn.net/Articles/993498/ )
301316 by Joe Brockmeier on LWN\. net.
302317
303- + [ Git For Each Ref] ( https://alchemists.io/articles/git_for_each_ref ) by Brooke Kuhlmann. Learn how
304- to use this command to make use of references for information dumping, statistcs, and much more.
305- Included in this article is use of the new ` is-base ` field name recently added in
306- [ Git 2.47.0] ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/git/git/master/Documentation/RelNotes/2.47.0.txt ) .
307-
308- + [ Searching for and navigating Git commits] ( https://alexharri.com/blog/searching-and-navigating-git-commits )
309- by Alex Harri.
310- + [ Why some of us like "interdiff" code review] ( https://gist.github.com/thoughtpolice/9c45287550a56b2047c6311fbadebed2 )
311- by Austin Seipp.
312- + [ How I Review GitHub PRs] ( https://www.bitquabit.com/post/how-i-do-github-prs/ )
313- by Benjamin Pollack.
314-
315318<!-- -
316319__Easy watching__
317320-->
@@ -321,7 +324,7 @@ __Scientific papers__
321324 An Empirical Study of Its Performance"_ ,
322325 [ arXiv:2409.13590] ( (https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13590) ) ,
323326 with dataset at < https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13618978 > (but no source code).
324- + based on a prior study:
327+ + It is based on a prior study:
325328 Nugroho, et al.: _ "How different are different diff algorithms in Git?:
326329 Use --histogram for code changes"_ (2019),
327330 < https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-019-09772-z >
0 commit comments