Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
They shouldn't |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I'm a maintainer of another package that still supports Python 2. I'm starting to run into issues where CI and testing packages are starting to remove Python 2 support. I think Python 2 packages days are numbered. It will be increasingly difficulty to maintain support. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
I would drop support for upcoming versions. If somebody needs Lark for a project in Python2, an older version can be used. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It seems that general Python 2 use is at around 6% : jetbrains.com/lp/python-developers-survey-2020
Should we just drop support for it in Lark?
It would make the code-base cleaner and easier to maintain, and we could use the new features.
Is anyone here still using Python 2?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions