Skip to content

Conversation

@keelerm84
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@keelerm84 keelerm84 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 19, 2025 18:55
@keelerm84 keelerm84 marked this pull request as draft August 19, 2025 18:55
cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

@keelerm84 keelerm84 force-pushed the mk/sdk-1418/retro-fit-fdv1 branch from 6e3ebf1 to 12bf69b Compare August 19, 2025 18:58
@keelerm84 keelerm84 removed the request for review from a team August 19, 2025 18:58
@keelerm84 keelerm84 marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2025 13:42
@keelerm84 keelerm84 requested a review from a team August 20, 2025 13:43

def stop(self):
if self._update_processor is not None:
self._update_processor.stop()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't fully know the logic here, but since we are setting the _update_processor in the start method should we set it back to None after it stops? Would there ever be a case where you could call the start method on a previously stopped processor? It probably doesn't matter in this code since the start method will just overwrite it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will matter. As you point out, calling start again would override it. But no one is going to be interacting with the datasystem directly. That's all internal to the SDK so shouldn't be an issue.

@keelerm84 keelerm84 merged commit c22ad26 into main Aug 22, 2025
21 of 22 checks passed
@keelerm84 keelerm84 deleted the mk/sdk-1418/retro-fit-fdv1 branch August 22, 2025 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants