Replies: 2 comments
-
I think you meant to say 1.0 not 0 correct? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
"think you meant to say 1.0 not 0 correct?" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
when you use ']' to speed up a lot for example when you go to a max speed: 100, and then you want to get back to zero you cant do that with the opposite shortcut '[' its either 1.03 or 0.94 i think it would be great if using these '[' and ']' you could actually go through zero (as one of the values) and i know its just multiplying by 1.1, but it would just make a lot of sense
i actually just came up with the solution on how to do that, you can just multiply by 1.1 as usual but then when you go down back to zero you can just use the previous numbers that you had going up and not divide by 1.1 again and same goes for when you slow down, yes you also can hit the bottom but then go back step by step from the numbers you got when you went down
how does that sound to you guys? my perfect *** just cant bear this imprecision
(maybe you can use a single array which is zero, and if you go up it adds a new value there and so on and so on and if you slow down, you set [length-1] value and remove the [length] value (to save memory?) and if you go down its similar algorithm or you could use a single array of already available values (from 0.01 to 100) and you just go back and forth playing around with '[' and ']' (but zero is included in this array!))
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions