Skip to content

Can syntax depth be supported? #5

@Yurii-huang

Description

@Yurii-huang

Sorry, calling lex one-dimensional table seems to have no effect. It seems a bit silly for reference and definition.
But I see checkstyle-8.43-all.jar about syntax parsing. I don't understand the meaning of this git.

Or is there any original intention?
For example, it enables simple syntax diagnosis

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions