Skip to content

Conversation

@pallebone
Copy link

Add additional needed live log value amounts for 30k and 80k respectively to traverse a longer time in the past. Please consider.

In the past versions there were more options to go back in time much further in opnsense. Since the new version this has been reduced, but the new interface is much faster. Can you consider these values so I dont need to manually edit the file myself after every update?

Kind regards
Peter

Add additional needed live log value amounts for 30k and 80k respectively to traverse a longer time in the past. Please consider.
@AdSchellevis
Copy link
Member

The new interface uses a larger queue underneath, which removes the need for very large tables (which will be extremely slow to render). I don't think we should do this, knowing the search window is larger anyway.

If I'm not mistaken, the total window size is specified here:

@pallebone
Copy link
Author

How do I display 30k records on the screen that match a specific label on the screen with the current setup? Seems to show only 100?

@AdSchellevis
Copy link
Member

it shows 100 out of maximum 30k, filters can be used to limit the active set.

@pallebone
Copy link
Author

pallebone commented Nov 8, 2025

it shows 100 out of maximum 30k, filters can be used to limit the active set.

Yes I understand. But 100 isn't enough and before the change it was many many many more. I believe at least 20k on the old version...

Is there a problem to leave the choice up to the end user? I understand you many not use this but for those of us who do…

@AdSchellevis
Copy link
Member

we'll keep it under consideration, when offering choices beyond the specification of the used components, it usually leads to complains from others at a later point in time. A bit larger is likely not an issue, but nobody has a screen that first 30k rows anyway

@pallebone
Copy link
Author

Ok thank you for considering the issue I have.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants