generated from privacycg/template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Closed
Description
While in parallel, the hasStorageAccess() algorithm creates a promise and fulfills it in-parallel, which is an invalid usage of the Promise API.
More generally, I don't really understand the flow of that algorithm. The method itself returns a promise and then right when it goes in parallel it creates another promise which becomes the resolved value of the outer promise? It seems like we should just pass in the first promise (that was properly created on the main thread) into the https://privacycg.github.io/storage-access/#determine-the-storage-access-policy algorithm, which would then resolve/reject it accordingly.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels