Skip to content

Conversation

@lwasser
Copy link
Member

@lwasser lwasser commented Oct 10, 2025

No description provided.

- Updating [software peer review policies](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/our-process/policies.html) as needed
- Helping editors find reviewers as necessary.

This role will also help manage conflict if it arises in the peer review process.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think linking the dashboard is a good addition!

Copy link
Contributor

@eliotwrobson eliotwrobson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the language sounds good! Still looks like in progress but the responsibilities seem reasonable, just managing the editorial staff and maintaining process documents.

- Updating [software peer review policies](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/our-process/policies.html) as needed
- Helping editors find reviewers as necessary.

This role will also help manage conflict if it arises in the peer review process.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think linking the dashboard is a good addition!

@lwasser lwasser marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2025 17:56
@lwasser
Copy link
Member Author

lwasser commented Nov 12, 2025

ok @eliotwrobson, my apologies here - I didn't realize I hadn't finished this document. I've fleshed it out a bit more with the dashboard. I'll add some screenshots later today and will send you a rendered version when that's done.

@lwasser lwasser changed the title enh: peer review lead enh: add new peer review lead role to the how to guides Nov 12, 2025
@lwasser
Copy link
Member Author

lwasser commented Nov 12, 2025

ok @eliotwrobson , here is an updated version

Rendered Draft

I think we should work together as well to ensure this role isn't more hours than I think it will be. So we can always adjust things on the fly. I'll share this in Slack as well.

This is failing ci because it's a new page and running against the live book. but everything is good to merge if we are both still happy with this as is.

Copy link
Contributor

@eliotwrobson eliotwrobson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lwasser went through the text and everything looks good! We can always revise the list of responsibilities as needed later on. I think this is a comprehensive starting point.

@lwasser
Copy link
Member Author

lwasser commented Nov 13, 2025

fantastic. Ok i'll clean things up here and will merge!!

@lwasser lwasser merged commit b66d168 into pyOpenSci:main Nov 13, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@lwasser lwasser deleted the peer-review-lead branch November 13, 2025 21:58
@lwasser
Copy link
Member Author

lwasser commented Nov 13, 2025

@eliotwrobson thank you for working on this with me!! 🚀

@lwasser
Copy link
Member Author

lwasser commented Nov 13, 2025

@all-contributors please add @eliotwrobson for docs, review

@allcontributors
Copy link
Contributor

@lwasser

I've put up a pull request to add @eliotwrobson! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants