Refine quality checks before publication

[TonyCTHsu]

Motivation:

It was slow and hard to debug.

What does this PR do?

1. Improve the checks in a more performant way (scoped with Github Actions App ID)
2. Enrich debug info with annotation
3. Extract JS scripts

Change log entry
None.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.73%. Comparing base (b9e1364) to head (449beea).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4606      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.74%   97.73%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1412     1412              
  Lines       86256    86255       -1     
  Branches     4354     4354              
==========================================
- Hits        84314    84300      -14     
- Misses       1942     1955      +13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

Datadog Report

Branch report: tonycthsu/refine-quality-checks
Commit report: 449beea
Test service: dd-trace-rb

✅ 0 Failed, 21011 Passed, 1376 Skipped, 3m 32.21s Total Time

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-04-28 14:31:16

Comparing candidate commit 449beea in PR branch tonycthsu/refine-quality-checks with baseline commit b9e1364 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 31 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

[p-datadog]

Do you mind adding a description to the JS files saying what they do?

[p-datadog]

Thanks!