Skip to content

Fix evaluation count in PyATF search strategies #342

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
stijnh wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix evaluation count in PyATF search strategies #342

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e1a42eb
Fix evaluation count in PyATF search strategies
stijnh Dec 8, 2025
19189c5
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:KernelTuner/kernel_tuner into pya…
benvanwerkhoven Dec 10, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions kernel_tuner/strategies/pyatf_strategies.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -82,11 +82,10 @@ def tune(searchspace: Searchspace, runner, tuning_options):
get_next_coordinates_or_indices = search_technique.get_next_coordinates
coordinates_or_indices = set() # Set[Union[Coordinates, Index]]
costs = {} # Dict[Union[Coordinates, Index], Cost]
eval_count = 0

try:
# optimization loop (KT-compatible re-implementation of `make_step` from TuningRun)
while eval_count < searchspace.size:
while len(tuning_options.unique_results) < searchspace.size:

# get new coordinates
if not coordinates_or_indices:
Expand All @@ -110,7 +109,6 @@ def tune(searchspace: Searchspace, runner, tuning_options):
valid = False
else:
cost = opt_result
eval_count += 1

# record the evaluation
costs[coords_or_index] = cost
Expand Down