Skip to content

Conversation

@DocSvartz
Copy link

No description provided.

@DocSvartz DocSvartz requested a review from andrerav December 22, 2025 09:34
@DocSvartz
Copy link
Author

DocSvartz commented Dec 22, 2025

@andrerav @stagep @DevTKSS If #622 is relevant?
First step, need to retarget mapster.core and mapster.sourceGenerator to netstandard2.0 and do not change the TFM for these solutions.

@DevTKSS
Copy link
Collaborator

DevTKSS commented Dec 22, 2025

@DocSvartz added comment on the issue.

Side Note for you: if you link to an issue or PR or similar, did you know that when your current line is a list (-) github will not just link it like you see it now, then show it with:

  • Status of the linked item (open/closed)
  • Title of the issue

I myself favorite to use this, since I get to know this. Perfectly suitable for e.g. "EPIC" Issue lists that are meant to collect multiple issues as links with status on one place. For example:

@DocSvartz
Copy link
Author

DocSvartz commented Dec 22, 2025

@DevTKSS It was more of a short explanation of why two files had different changes than the others and that this is not a misprint. :)

@DocSvartz
Copy link
Author

DocSvartz commented Dec 26, 2025

@andrerav @stagep @DevTKSS
Regarding features, this is already a release, I don't plan to add anything.

The only thing I'm thinking about is moving the temporary configuration work into a separate project Mapster.Experemental Mapster.Experimental:

It will be able to accept new features as candidates for the main Mapster project. Let me know if this is a good idea. :)

In relation to:

I wanted to combine the work on these two projects (both would involve changes to the API configuration).
But so far, it's not working out very well.
It will likely be two steps with two API configuration changes. 😒

@stagep
Copy link

stagep commented Dec 26, 2025

@docs FYI Experimental is the correct spelling :)

@DocSvartz
Copy link
Author

@stagep yes.
I decided to brush up on how Mapster works again. And it seems I've gone crazy again.🤣 🤪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants