Skip to content

Conversation

@shengliangxu
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Type of change: ?

Bug fix

Overview: ?

  1. We are passing incorrect extra args to pipeline inference.
  2. Need a default empty list for the list argument component-dtype

Testing

Passed SDXL pipeline without component dtype

@copy-pr-bot
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

Signed-off-by: Shengliang Xu <[email protected]>
@shengliangxu shengliangxu force-pushed the shengliangx/fix-extra-args branch from 404194a to 4409beb Compare November 24, 2025 17:40
@shengliangxu shengliangxu marked this pull request as ready for review November 24, 2025 17:40
@shengliangxu shengliangxu requested a review from a team as a code owner November 24, 2025 17:40
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.57%. Comparing base (7a36ccc) to head (fe9518d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #605   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.57%   74.57%           
=======================================
  Files         183      183           
  Lines       18412    18412           
=======================================
  Hits        13730    13730           
  Misses       4682     4682           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@shengliangxu shengliangxu changed the title Fix extra args and component-dtype default set Fix extra args and --component-dtype default value Nov 24, 2025
@shengliangxu shengliangxu self-assigned this Nov 24, 2025
@kevalmorabia97 kevalmorabia97 requested review from jingyu-ml and removed request for kevalmorabia97 November 24, 2025 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants