Skip to content

Conversation

@puffnfresh
Copy link

@puffnfresh puffnfresh commented Jul 24, 2022

No description provided.

@puffnfresh
Copy link
Author

Actually using it as a module seems to not work though:

 try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x230/0x320
 __component_add+0xc8/0x1c8
 component_add+0x1c/0x28
 dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_host_attach+0x5c/0x110 [rockchipdrm]
 dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach+0x7c/0xd0 [dw_mipi_dsi]
 mipi_dsi_attach+0x30/0x48
 sharp_ls054_probe+0x120/0x1d0 [panel_sharp_ls054b3sx01]
 mipi_dsi_drv_probe+0x28/0x38
 really_probe+0x14c/0x398
 __driver_probe_device+0x11c/0x190
 driver_probe_device+0x44/0xf8
 __driver_attach+0xc4/0x1a8
 bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xd0
 driver_attach+0x2c/0x38
 bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x230
 driver_register+0x6c/0x128
 mipi_dsi_driver_register_full+0x60/0x70
 sharp_ls054_driver_init+0x28/0x1000 [panel_sharp_ls054b3sx01]
 do_one_initcall+0x50/0x230
 do_init_module+0x50/0x218
 load_module+0x21f4/0x2700
 __do_sys_init_module+0x1d4/0x240
 __arm64_sys_init_module+0x24/0x30
 invoke_syscall+0x4c/0x110
 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf8
 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x90
 el0_svc+0x2c/0x88
 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb8
 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

@puffnfresh
Copy link
Author

Seems like there was an attempt to patch that issue but it was rejected since it wasn't quite right:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant