Call Subscriber's next method for async iterators #202
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
benlesh
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2025
github-actions bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2025
SHA: bebe10d Reason: push, by domfarolino Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks to @jakearchibald for catching this and reporting it. This text must've existed in the spec PR at one point, since I've quoted the spec text above the implementation. I'm pretty sure what happened is when I did a ton of rebasing for the async stuff to finish it off in parallel with the ref-counted producer change, the later changes were lost, and here we are.
Preview | Diff