Skip to content

Ory Kratos's setting required_aal `highest_available` does not properly respect code + mfa credentials

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 26, 2024 in ory/kratos • Updated Sep 26, 2024

Package

gomod github.com/ory/kratos (Go)

Affected versions

<= 1.2.0

Patched versions

1.3.0

Description

Preconditions

  • The code login method is enabled with the passwordless_enabled flag set to true .
  • A 2FA method such as totp is enabled.
  • required_aal of the whomai check or the settings flow is set to highest_available. AAL stands for Authenticator Assurance Levels and can range from 0 (no factor) to 2 (two factors).
  • A user uses the code method as the only login method available. They do not have a password or any other first factor credential enabled.
  • The user has 2FA enabled.
  • The user’s available_aal is incorrectly stored in the database as aal1 or aal0 or NULL.
  • A user signs in using the code method, but does not complete the 2FA challenge.

Example server configuration

Below you will find an vulnerable example configuration. Keep in mind that, for the account to be vulnerable, the account must have no first factor except the code method enabled plus a second factor.

selfservice:
  methods:
    code:
      # The `code` login method is enabled with the `passwordless_enabled` flag set to `true`
      passwordless_enabled: true
    totp:
      # 2FA method such as `totp` is enabled
      enabled: true
  flows:
    settings:
      # This is set
      required_aal: highest_available
session:
  whoami:
    # Or this
    required_aal: highest_available

Impact

Given the preconditions, the highest_available setting will incorrectly assume that the identity’s highest available AAL is aal1 even though it really is aal2. This means that the highest_available configuration will act as if the user has only one factor set up, for that particular user. This means that they can call the settings and whoami endpoint without a aal2 session, even though that should be disallowed.

An attacker would need to steal or guess a valid login OTP of a user who has only OTP for login enabled and who has an incorrect available_aal value stored, to exploit this vulnerability.

All other aspects of the session (e.g. the session’s aal) are not impacted by this issue.

On Ory Network, only 0,00066% of registered users were affected by this issue, and most of those users appeared to be test users. Their respective AAL values have since been updated and they are no longer vulnerable to this attack.

Patches

Version 1.3.0 is not affected by this issue.

Workarounds

If you require 2FA please disable the passwordless code login method. If that is not possible, check the sessions aal to identify if the user has aal1 or aal2.

References

@aeneasr aeneasr published to ory/kratos Sep 26, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 26, 2024
Reviewed Sep 26, 2024
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 26, 2024
Last updated Sep 26, 2024

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity High
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required High
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(23rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Authentication

When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2024-45042

GHSA ID

GHSA-wc43-73w7-x2f5

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.