Skip to content

Conversation

@hackergin
Copy link

@hackergin hackergin commented May 22, 2025

Purpose of the pull request

Add a new task plugin for refresh flink materialized table.

close #17086

Brief change log

Verify this pull request

  • Added dolphinscheduler flink materialized table end to end test

@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented May 22, 2025

Thanks for opening this pull request! Please check out our contributing guidelines. (https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/blob/dev/docs/docs/en/contribute/join/pull-request.md)

@github-actions github-actions bot added UI ui and front end related backend test e2e e2e test labels May 22, 2025
@hackergin hackergin force-pushed the support-flink-materialized-table branch 2 times, most recently from adb610e to 04d013f Compare May 22, 2025 05:51
@lsyldliu
Copy link

Hi, @ruanwenjun, @SbloodyS can you help review this pr?

@SbloodyS
Copy link
Member

Please check the failed CI. @hackergin

@SbloodyS SbloodyS added the DSIP label May 22, 2025
@SbloodyS SbloodyS added this to the 3.3.1 milestone May 22, 2025
@hackergin hackergin force-pushed the support-flink-materialized-table branch from 284d06b to ab0a878 Compare May 22, 2025 19:12
@hackergin hackergin force-pushed the support-flink-materialized-table branch 2 times, most recently from 888b7dc to 033c3d4 Compare May 25, 2025 10:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added the CI&CD label Jun 1, 2025
@hackergin hackergin force-pushed the support-flink-materialized-table branch from ab3c85c to 0e1151d Compare June 2, 2025 03:12
@hackergin hackergin requested a review from EricGao888 as a code owner June 15, 2025 15:22
@hackergin hackergin force-pushed the support-flink-materialized-table branch 2 times, most recently from 0032ecd to 5343781 Compare June 16, 2025 16:28
@hackergin hackergin force-pushed the support-flink-materialized-table branch from 5343781 to 55aab6a Compare June 17, 2025 14:47
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the document label Jun 17, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
53.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 60%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@hackergin
Copy link
Author

Two CI issues:

  1. dependency check is failing with Cannot construct instance of ModifiedCiaType, problem: SAFETY - seems like a tool compatibility issue with new NVD data, not related to my changes.

  2. Code coverage is below threshold. Not sure if this is required since I noticed other similar tasks don't seem to have corresponding tests either.

@SbloodyS Should I address the coverage issue or is it OK to proceed as-is?

@SbloodyS
Copy link
Member

  1. You can ignore OWASP Dependentcy Check for now.

Code coverage is below threshold. Not sure if this is required since I noticed other similar tasks don't seem to have corresponding tests either.

Yes.

@SbloodyS SbloodyS removed this from the 3.3.1 milestone Aug 18, 2025
@SbloodyS SbloodyS closed this Nov 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backend CI&CD DSIP e2e e2e test test UI ui and front end related

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[DSIP-90][plugin] Introduce new task plugin for Flink materialized table

4 participants