Skip to content

Conversation

@TCeason
Copy link
Collaborator

@TCeason TCeason commented Feb 6, 2025

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

Tests

  • Unit Test
  • Logic Test
  • Benchmark Test
  • No Test - Explain why

Type of change

  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
  • Documentation Update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance Improvement
  • Other (please describe):

This change is Reviewable

@TCeason TCeason marked this pull request as draft February 6, 2025 09:04
@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr-feature this PR introduces a new feature to the codebase label Feb 6, 2025
@TCeason TCeason marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 13:34
@TCeason TCeason requested review from b41sh and sundy-li February 6, 2025 13:34
@sundy-li sundy-li added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 7, 2025
@TCeason
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TCeason commented Feb 7, 2025

cc @soyeric128 Doc needed.

Merged via the queue into databendlabs:main with commit 3c1c34d Feb 7, 2025
73 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-feature this PR introduces a new feature to the codebase

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature: Allow extract parts from interval type

2 participants