Skip to content

Conversation

@strengejacke
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @strengejacke, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the format_p_adjust function by integrating a new sup-t p-value adjustment method. This addition expands the statistical capabilities of the function, allowing for more advanced multiple comparison corrections, particularly those involving multivariate t-distributions.

Highlights

  • New p-adjustment method: Added support for a new sup-t (supremum-t) p-value adjustment method within the format_p_adjust function.
  • Dependency: Introduced a dependency on the mvtnorm package for performing the multivariate t-distribution calculations required by the sup-t adjustment.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new sup-t method for p-value adjustment. While the intent is good, the current implementation has critical flaws, including a call to an undefined function and incorrect statistical logic. I have provided a detailed comment with a suggested fix to correctly implement the sup-t adjustment.

@strengejacke
Copy link
Member Author

@bwiernik FYI

@strengejacke strengejacke requested a review from Copilot July 7, 2025 10:19
@strengejacke
Copy link
Member Author

@gemini-code-assist review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces the sup-t option for p_adjust, enabling the calculation of simultaneous confidence intervals. The implementation is well-structured, and the documentation updates are thorough. I've provided comments to enhance code robustness and clarity.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a new "sup-t" option for the p_adjust argument in model_parameters(), enabling simultaneous confidence bands (sup-t) adjustments.
Key changes:

  • Implemented sup-t adjustment logic (.p_adjust_supt, .supt_adjust) and integrated it into .p_adjust.
  • Updated documentation and help files across multiple model methods to include "sup-t" and added the Montiel Olea & Plagborg-Møller (2019) reference.
  • Added tests and snapshots covering sup-t adjustments and extended existing tests for "scheffe", "tukey", and "sidak".

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 17 out of 17 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
tests/testthat/test-p_adjust.R Added tests for scheffe, tukey, sidak, and sup-t p_adjust.
tests/testthat/_snaps/p_adjust.md Snapshot for sup-t output.
man/*.Rd (multiple) Updated p_adjust documentation to include "sup-t" and citation.
inst/WORDLIST Added names (Møller, Montiel, Plagborg, Olea) and SVARs.
R/format_p_adjust.R Integrated "sup-t" logic into p-value adjustment workflow.
R/1_model_parameters.R Updated Roxygen docs to describe "sup-t" option.
DESCRIPTION & NEWS.md Bumped version, added mvtnorm Suggests, and noted sup-t in NEWS.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

R/format_p_adjust.R:134

  • The scheffe adjustment logic assumes model@linfct is available and qr() succeeds; consider wrapping in tryCatch and falling back if the model structure doesn't support linfct.
.p_adjust_scheffe <- function(model, params, stat_column, rank_adjust = 1) {

@strengejacke strengejacke merged commit f3eaf80 into main Jul 7, 2025
16 of 23 checks passed
@strengejacke strengejacke deleted the sup_t_adjust branch July 7, 2025 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants