Skip to content

Conversation

@strengejacke
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1132

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @strengejacke, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request delivers a crucial bug fix for the parameters package, resolving a crash that previously occurred when processing pscl models (zeroinfl and hurdle) that included string variables. The underlying issue stemmed from an attempt to manipulate pretty_labels when they were NULL. The fix involves a precise adjustment to the code's logic, ensuring that such operations are only performed when pretty_labels are valid. A new, targeted test case has been introduced to confirm the fix and prevent future regressions.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Resolved a crash in the parameters package that occurred when pscl models (specifically zeroinfl and hurdle models) were fitted using string variables. This addresses the issue reported in #1132.
  • Code Refinement: Refactored the format_parameters.parameters_model function in R/format_parameters.R by relocating the logic responsible for prefixing pretty_labels with 'count_' and 'zero_' for pscl models. This logic is now correctly nested within a check to ensure pretty_labels is not NULL, preventing operations on non-existent objects.
  • Test Coverage: Added a new testthat test case in tests/testthat/test-pretty_names.R to specifically validate that pscl::zeroinfl models, when used with character variables, no longer cause a crash and produce the expected output dimensions.
  • Version Update: Incremented the package version in DESCRIPTION from 0.26.0.15 to 0.26.0.16.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request addresses a crash issue with string variables in the pscl package. The fix involves relocating a block of code related to handling 'count_' and 'zero_' prefixes for models from pscl within a conditional block that checks for the existence of pretty labels. Additionally, a test case has been added to ensure that the code doesn't crash when pretty labels are NULL.

@strengejacke strengejacke merged commit 42e0e9c into main Jul 9, 2025
17 of 19 checks passed
@strengejacke strengejacke deleted the strengejacke/issue1132 branch July 9, 2025 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pscl crashes with string variable

2 participants