Skip to content

Conversation

@lena-kashtelyan
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Same reasoning as in D89737933: ax/service was always a misnomer (of my creation, no denying here), time for it to be ready to die once AxClient is deprecated!

Differential Revision:
D89749717

Privacy Context Container: L1307644

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Dec 24, 2025
@meta-codesync
Copy link

meta-codesync bot commented Dec 24, 2025

@lena-kashtelyan has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D89749717.

lena-kashtelyan pushed a commit to lena-kashtelyan/Ax that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#4700

Same reasoning as in D89737933: `ax/service` was always a misnomer (of my creation, no denying here), time for it to be ready to die once `AxClient` is deprecated!

Differential Revision:
D89749717

Privacy Context Container: L1307644
lena-kashtelyan pushed a commit to lena-kashtelyan/Ax that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#4700

Same reasoning as in D89737933: `ax/service` was always a misnomer (of my creation, no denying here), time for it to be ready to die once `AxClient` is deprecated!

Differential Revision:
D89749717

Privacy Context Container: L1307644
lena-kashtelyan pushed a commit to lena-kashtelyan/Ax that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#4700

Same reasoning as in D89737933: `ax/service` was always a misnomer (of my creation, no denying here), time for it to be ready to die once `AxClient` is deprecated!

Differential Revision:
D89749717

Privacy Context Container: L1307644
lena-kashtelyan and others added 2 commits December 24, 2025 10:25
Differential Revision: D89737933
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#4700

Same reasoning as in D89737933: `ax/service` was always a misnomer (of my creation, no denying here), time for it to be ready to die once `AxClient` is deprecated!

Differential Revision:
D89749717

Privacy Context Container: L1307644
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.50335% with 56 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 96.68%. Comparing base (49cf6bd) to head (371ef7c).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ax/orchestration/orchestrator.py 92.18% 53 Missing ⚠️
ax/service/orchestrator.py 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4700      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.66%   96.68%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         578      580       +2     
  Lines       60525    60530       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        58508    58521      +13     
+ Misses       2017     2009       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported meta-exported

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants