Skip to content

Upgrading Opensearch to 2.9 #4384

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Upgrading Opensearch to 2.9 #4384

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

@jimmyihuoma1
Copy link
Contributor

@jimmyihuoma1 jimmyihuoma1 commented May 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Upgrading Opensearch to 2.9

@aguest-kc aguest-kc self-assigned this May 1, 2025
@aguest-kc aguest-kc self-requested a review May 1, 2025 15:24
@aguest-kc aguest-kc removed their assignment May 1, 2025
@aguest-kc aguest-kc assigned aguest-kc and unassigned aguest-kc May 22, 2025
@aguest-kc
Copy link
Contributor

aguest-kc commented May 29, 2025

The existing code seems to function correctly with OpenSearch 2.9. I ran into a few issues with settings in the docker-compose file, but those were fixed.

The only remaining issue is that the Kibana dashboard wants a username and password, even though the security plugin is disabled on the OpenSearch container. The documented default of admin/admin didn't work. I'll keep looking for a fix for this and testing OpenSearch as I have time.

@sethstoudenmier sethstoudenmier marked this pull request as draft July 1, 2025 16:41
@aguest-kc
Copy link
Contributor

aguest-kc commented Aug 7, 2025

The only remaining issue is that the Kibana dashboard wants a username and password, even though the security plugin is disabled on the OpenSearch container. The documented default of admin/admin didn't work. I'll keep looking for a fix for this and testing OpenSearch as I have time.

I was able to disable the security on the OpenSearch Dashboard. This PR should be in a good spot for others to review and test locally. I've been running it locally for a while and I have not noticed any issues with our current code.

@jimmyihuoma1
Copy link
Contributor Author

jimmyihuoma1 commented Aug 7, 2025

Awesome thanks @aguest-kc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@aguest-kc aguest-kc Awaiting requested review from aguest-kc

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@aguest-kc aguest-kc

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jimmyihuoma1 @aguest-kc