Closes #2063

[yeruchomWhale]

Hey there! So you want to contribute to a Firebase SDK?
Before you file this pull request, please read these guidelines:

Discussion

• Read the contribution guidelines (CONTRIBUTING.md).
• If this has been discussed in an issue, make sure to link to the issue here.
  If not, go file an issue about this before creating a pull request to discuss.

Testing

• Make sure all existing tests in the repository pass after your change.
• If you fixed a bug or added a feature, add a new test to cover your code.

API Changes

• At this time we cannot accept changes that affect the public API. If you'd like to help
  us make Firebase APIs better, please propose your change in an issue so that we
  can discuss it together.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @yeruchomWhale, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the user authentication module by exposing the passwordUpdatedAt timestamp. This allows applications to retrieve and utilize information about when a user's password was last changed, which can be valuable for security auditing and user management. The changes involve updating data structures to accommodate this new field, implementing its integration into the UserMetadata class, and adding thorough unit tests to ensure its correct functionality and reliability.

Highlights

• API Enhancement: Added a new passwordUpdatedAt field to the GetAccountInfoUserResponse interface, allowing the API to return the timestamp of the last password update.
• User Metadata: Introduced a passwordUpdatedAt readonly property to the UserMetadata class, making this information accessible to consumers of the SDK.
• Serialization: Ensured the passwordUpdatedAt property is correctly serialized when UserMetadata objects are converted to JSON.
• Unit Testing: Added comprehensive unit tests for the UserMetadata.passwordUpdatedAt property, covering its correct parsing from API responses and proper handling of cases where the field is not provided.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly adds the passwordUpdatedAt field to the user record, including necessary updates to interfaces, class implementation, and tests. The changes are well-implemented and follow existing patterns. I have one suggestion to improve the type definition for the new property for better accuracy.

[yeruchomWhale]

@lahirumaramba would you be please be able to review? thanks!