Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 8, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@hargut
Copy link
Contributor

@hargut hargut commented Aug 20, 2025

log deployment status, replicaset status, pod status and logs or daemonset status, pod status and logs in case of a rollout timeout

use kube instead of kubectl where feasible

fixes: #437

log deployment status, replicaset status, pod status and logs or
daemonset status, pod status and logs in case of a rollout timeout

use kube instead of kubectl where feasible

Signed-off-by: Harald Gutmann <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 20, 2025
@shaneutt shaneutt self-assigned this Aug 29, 2025
@shaneutt shaneutt moved this to Review in Release v1.4.0 Aug 29, 2025
@shaneutt shaneutt added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Sep 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@shaneutt shaneutt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 2, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hargut, shaneutt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 2, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 2, 2025
@shaneutt shaneutt added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. tide/merge-method-rebase Denotes a PR that should be rebased by tide when it merges. and removed tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. labels Sep 2, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 2, 2025
@hargut hargut closed this Sep 2, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review to Done in Release v1.4.0 Sep 2, 2025
@hargut hargut deleted the feat/enhance-troubleshooting branch September 2, 2025 18:30
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-rebase Denotes a PR that should be rebased by tide when it merges.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

enhance integration tests

3 participants