feature: engine claim by language and class #13838
Draft
+221
−69
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Apologies for filing a PR over holidays. We can discuss next week when everyone is back, but I wanted to put in a draft.
Marimo's preferred syntax for executable cells is
This already works fine as long as the engine is directly specified in the metadata
But the engine won't claim the language without this, because jupyter claims python.
I think it would be nice for us to support claiming by both language and first class, because it allows engine discovery to resolve in favor of an engine extension when the extension supports the same language as a built-in engine.
It can be done in a backward-compatible way:
Where old engines still return true, false, treated as 1 or 0, and new engines can return 2.
But this is a fundamental change to engine discovery, so I want to discuss as a group before merging.
@dmadisetti