Allow adding blockers that don't create a beforeUnload event #949
+108
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Could also add a flag to block. would like to see some solution merged, I had to drop the blocking feature on an app so i can upgrade to react-router v6 which sucks :( |
|
I don't understand how this is not merged yet. The unavoidable beforeunload handler forces you to implement hacky workarounds if you simply want to intercept navigations by using |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows adding blockers that don't create a beforeUnload event, so blocks can prevent or otherwise handle location changes but won't block reloading the page.
Normal blockers are looked at first (to support prompts), and then if they all allow the transaction the no-unload blockers are checked afterwards.
See #921 for reasoning (forcing a full page load for non-SPA routes). What are the maintainer's thoughts on this approach?