Skip to content

Conversation

@GrigorenkoPV
Copy link
Contributor

@GrigorenkoPV GrigorenkoPV commented Nov 6, 2025

Tracking issue: #135894
FCP completed: #135894 (comment)

1.96.0 was chosen because I don't think the remaining month until 1.93.0 becomes beta is enough for the FCP to finish and this to get merged, so 1.94.0 + a couple of versions of leeway: #135894 (comment)

Closes #135894

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. labels Nov 6, 2025
@hanna-kruppe
Copy link
Contributor

I would suggest splitting out the lint change into a separate PR. It would be useful even before stabilization, I don't think it requires its own FCP, and it'll make the API stabilization itself a bit easier to review. That's especially important since the simultaneous deprecation makes it a big and tricky diff by stabilization standards!

@GrigorenkoPV
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good idea!

Done: #148601

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2025
…ng, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang#135894
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2025
…ng, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang#135894
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2025
…ng, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang#135894
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2025
Rollup merge of #148601 - GrigorenkoPV:invalid_atomic_ordering, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from #148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: #135894
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2025
…ooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang/rust#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang/rust#135894
makai410 pushed a commit to makai410/rustc_public that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2025
…ooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang/rust#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang/rust#135894
makai410 pushed a commit to makai410/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2025
…ng, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang#135894
makai410 pushed a commit to makai410/rustc_public that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2025
…ooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang/rust#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang/rust#135894
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 23, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #149222) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GrigorenkoPV GrigorenkoPV marked this pull request as ready for review December 24, 2025 23:22
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 24, 2025
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Dec 24, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 24, 2025

r? @scottmcm

rustbot has assigned @scottmcm.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@GrigorenkoPV
Copy link
Contributor Author

GrigorenkoPV commented Dec 24, 2025

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-FCP

RIP

and deprecate fetch_update starting 1.96.0
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 24, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

Kobzol pushed a commit to Kobzol/rustc_codegen_cranelift that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2025
…ooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang/rust#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang/rust#135894
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking Issue for atomic_try_update

6 participants