Skip to content

Conversation

@chirag-parmar
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 2, 2025

Unit Test Results

0 files   -        12  0 suites   - 2 424   0s ⏱️ - 1h 1m 34s
0 tests  - 12 629  0 ✔️  - 12 064  0 💤  - 565  0 ±0 
0 runs   - 63 532  0 ✔️  - 62 804  0 💤  - 728  0 ±0 

Results for commit 1820e1f. ± Comparison against base commit 9f44dac.

.}
UpdateScoreProc = proc(id: uint64, value: int) {.gcsafe, raises: [].}

EthLCBackend* = object
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Light client naming is already sufficiently confusing with all the types of light clients.

I would suggest to either stick here with naming scheme of the existing file: LightClientBackend.
Or to call it ConsensusLightClientBackend

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants