Skip to content

Conversation

@daniel-kmiecik
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@daniel-kmiecik daniel-kmiecik force-pushed the issue2113-explicit-object-schema branch from 14266aa to 073c7d7 Compare June 16, 2025 14:37
@daniel-kmiecik daniel-kmiecik marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2025 14:38
@daniel-kmiecik daniel-kmiecik force-pushed the issue2113-explicit-object-schema branch from 073c7d7 to d180681 Compare June 16, 2025 14:58

private boolean aggregateCombinators;

private ParseOptions parseOptions;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would initialize this to new ParseOptions() to avoid NPEs if folks keep using other constructors

Copy link
Contributor Author

@daniel-kmiecik daniel-kmiecik Jun 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@daniel-kmiecik daniel-kmiecik force-pushed the issue2113-explicit-object-schema branch from 76d0b1a to ea8f519 Compare June 17, 2025 09:44
@daniel-kmiecik daniel-kmiecik merged commit bb286a7 into master Jun 17, 2025
5 checks passed
@daniel-kmiecik daniel-kmiecik deleted the issue2113-explicit-object-schema branch June 17, 2025 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants