RPHI Airspace update

[HacobAllon]

RPHI -> MNL
Added MNL NW, NE, SE,SW, W

Description of changes

Changes RPHI -> MNL

Reason and motivation

Adds useful sectors so that pilots know which frequency to contact

Approved contributior?

• I am on the approved contributers list
• I have sent an request by email to get approved
• Someone on the approved contributer list will review this request

[github-actions]

Validate data: https://vatsim-radar.com/data/vatspy/1076/compare

For controllers data testing visit https://docs.vatsim-radar.com/contributing/debug.html

[github-actions]

❌ Github login HacobAllon was not found in contributor list. Please read Readme to learn more.

Keep in mind: this message will not update automatically. Please, re-run validate-contributor job when this will be solved.

[daniluk4000]

You are not approved as contributor, and all checks fail

[HacobAllon]

You are not approved as contributor, and all checks fail

My self and my vACC Director sent an email months ago regarding this. The email should've been sent by @vatphil.com

[HacobAllon]

Should be completed now.

[daniluk4000]

Those are old misaligments. Would it be possible to fix them though?

WBFC and KZAK

[HacobAllon]

It weird as thats the decimal code given by AeroGNG 4, 132.53333333333.

same thing with the one with WBFC

[Adrian2k]

Borders in our dataset must allign.
You can either update the other FIR's borders since it is a small change, or adjust to keep the current border as it has no operational effect for the pilots regardless. Up to you, but must be fixed before we can merge.

[Adrian2k]

Also we prefer the dataset to be defined as RPHI, with MNL as secondary code - this is how it is done almost everywhere else where possible.

Edit: You must do this change - MN belongs to another country, so it will be mislabeled as belonging to Nicaragua. We also want our dataset alphabetically sorted; this helps maintaining an alphabetical sorting.

[Adrian2k]

You are not approved as contributor, and all checks fail

My self and my vACC Director sent an email months ago regarding this. The email should've been sent by @vatphil.com

As we also sent out via email to all previous registered contributers, including an vatphil.com email, there was a change of policy 18th July, so all contributers was removed and must read the new policy and apply for access.
No email from any vatphil.com has been recieved after 18th July.