Skip to content

Conversation

@systay
Copy link
Collaborator

@systay systay commented Oct 16, 2025

Includes the changes required to go back into dev mode (v23.0.0-SNAPSHOT) after the release of v23.0.0-RC1.

This Pull Request is part of #18594

… `v23.0.0-RC1` release

This commit was made automatically by the vitess-releaser tool.

See https://github.com/vitessio/vitess-releaser

Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <[email protected]>
@systay systay added Component: General Changes throughout the code base Type: Release labels Oct 16, 2025
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Oct 16, 2025
@systay systay mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2025
52 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v23.0.0 milestone Oct 16, 2025
@systay systay removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Oct 16, 2025
@systay systay mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
40 tasks
@systay
Copy link
Collaborator Author

systay commented Oct 30, 2025

Replaced by #18842

@systay systay closed this Oct 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Component: General Changes throughout the code base Type: Release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants