Skip to content

Conversation

@HanFa
Copy link
Contributor

@HanFa HanFa commented Nov 12, 2025

Enable model-specific runtimeClassName overrides with global fallback. This allows different models to use different deployment runtime classes while maintaining a default global setting.

FIX #745

BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE


  • Make sure the code changes pass the pre-commit checks.
  • Sign-off your commit by using -s when doing git commit
  • Try to classify PRs for easy understanding of the type of changes, such as [Bugfix], [Feat], and [CI].
Detailed Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to production-stack! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps us maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Please try to classify PRs for easy understanding of the type of changes. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Feat] for new features in the cluster (e.g., autoscaling, disaggregated prefill, etc.).
  • [Router] for changes to the vllm_router (e.g., routing algorithm, router observability, etc.).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • Pass all linter checks. Please use pre-commit to format your code. See README.md for installation.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Please include sufficient tests to ensure the change is stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.

DCO and Signed-off-by

When contributing changes to this project, you must agree to the DCO. Commits must include a Signed-off-by: header which certifies agreement with the terms of the DCO.

Using -s with git commit will automatically add this header.

What to Expect for the Reviews

We aim to address all PRs in a timely manner. If no one reviews your PR within 5 days, please @-mention one of YuhanLiu11
, Shaoting-Feng or ApostaC.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @HanFa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the flexibility of model deployments by enabling per-model runtimeClassName configuration within the Helm charts. It allows users to define a default runtimeClassName that applies globally, while also providing the option to override this setting for specific models. This capability is crucial for scenarios requiring different execution environments or specialized runtimes for various models, improving resource management and isolation within the Kubernetes cluster.

Highlights

  • Per-Model RuntimeClass Configuration: Introduced the ability to specify a Kubernetes runtimeClassName for individual models, allowing for fine-grained control over their execution environments.
  • Global RuntimeClass Fallback: Implemented a fallback mechanism where models without a specific runtimeClassName will inherit the value from a global servingEngineSpec.runtimeClassName setting.
  • Helm Chart Updates: Modified the deployment-vllm-multi.yaml and ray-cluster.yaml templates to incorporate the new runtimeClassName logic for both standalone deployments and Ray cluster nodes.
  • New Unit Tests: Added a new Helm unit test file (runtimeClassName_test.yaml) to thoroughly validate the correct application of both global and model-specific runtimeClassName settings.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
    • .github/workflows/functionality-helm-chart.yml
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a valuable feature by allowing per-model runtimeClassName overrides with a global fallback. The implementation in the Helm templates is clean and effectively uses the default function. The addition of unit tests is also a great step. My review includes a couple of suggestions to enhance the clarity of the example values and to improve test coverage by adding checks for more edge cases. These changes will make the new feature more robust and easier for users to understand.

@HanFa
Copy link
Contributor Author

HanFa commented Nov 12, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a valuable feature for per-model runtimeClassName configuration, allowing for more flexible deployments. The implementation is on the right track, but I've identified a subtle issue in the fallback logic. The use of the default function doesn't correctly handle cases where a model-specific runtimeClassName is explicitly set to an empty string to override a global setting. I've provided suggestions to use a more robust ternary and hasKey combination to fix this. Additionally, I've recommended adding a new test case to ensure this specific override scenario is covered. The documentation and example value changes are clear and well-executed.

Copy link
Collaborator

@zerofishnoodles zerofishnoodles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zerofishnoodles zerofishnoodles merged commit 62cf67b into vllm-project:main Nov 19, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feature: multiple runtime classes

2 participants