Skip to content

Conversation

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

@afs afs commented Nov 6, 2025

See w3c/rdf-concepts#247

the W3C automated process requires all editors to be active W3C members;
we discussed with the chairs and other co-editors and this solution was proposed.


Preview | Diff

@afs afs requested a review from Tpt November 6, 2025 19:16
@afs
Copy link
Contributor Author

afs commented Nov 6, 2025

@Tpt - this PR is one of several updating the editors section of syntax documents.

We don't have a editor for RDF/XML at the moment. (I'm not sure the document will auto-publish after this PR is merged.)

Could I ask for a review from a knowledgeable working group member to verify this PR follows proper process? (forgot you are not available ATM)

Thanks.

@afs afs removed the request for review from Tpt November 7, 2025 09:06
@afs afs merged commit 3dd34f3 into main Nov 7, 2025
3 checks passed
@afs afs deleted the update-editors branch November 7, 2025 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants