Edits for FPWD publication #403
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2,18 +2,20 @@ | |
| <html> | ||
| <head> | ||
| <meta charset="utf-8"> | ||
| <title>Web Cryptography</title> | ||
| <script src="https://www.w3.org/Tools/respec/respec-w3c" class="remove"></script> | ||
| <link rel="stylesheet" href="webcrypto.css" type="text/css" /> | ||
| <script class=remove> | ||
| var respecConfig = { | ||
| specStatus: "ED", | ||
| level: 2, | ||
| editors: [ | ||
| { | ||
| name: "Daniel Huigens", | ||
| mailto: "[email protected]", | ||
| company: "Proton AG", | ||
| companyURL: "https://proton.me/", | ||
| w3cid: 99209, | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| name: "Mark Watson", | ||
|
|
@@ -25,7 +27,7 @@ | |
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| github: "https://github.com/w3c/webcrypto", | ||
| shortName: "webcrypto", | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Will the former short name be redirected?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. yes, of course |
||
| group: "webappsec", | ||
| xref: ['html', 'dom', 'webidl', 'infra', 'encoding'], | ||
| localBiblio: { | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you make this change?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the new specs, the API name is usually implied considering the type of specification as a browser API. However, if you think it would be useful in the title, I will make the change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm on the fence, but given that it doesn't define all things Web Cryptography I think it's better to keep it in.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it makes sense to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for changing it back to Web Cryptography API!
I also think that it makes more sense as what we describe is the API