Skip to content

Conversation

@paritytech-release-backport-bot

Backport #10180 into stable2509 from bkchr.

See the documentation on how to use this bot.

@paritytech-release-backport-bot
Copy link
Author

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin backport-10180-to-stable2509
git worktree add --checkout .worktree/backport-10180-to-stable2509 backport-10180-to-stable2509
cd .worktree/backport-10180-to-stable2509
git reset --hard HEAD^
git cherry-pick -x 12f9d5987303545220466c62fa5e0621abc72025
git push --force-with-lease

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A3-backport Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch. label Nov 6, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from bkchr November 6, 2025 14:53
@EgorPopelyaev
Copy link
Contributor

@bkchr here are some conflicts as well, could you please check

@bkchr bkchr marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 13:27
@bkchr bkchr requested a review from a team as a code owner November 10, 2025 13:27
@bkchr bkchr enabled auto-merge (squash) November 10, 2025 13:27
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is amending an existing release. Please proceed with extreme caution,
as to not impact downstream teams that rely on the stability of it. Some things to consider:

  • Backports are only for 'patch' or 'minor' changes. No 'major' or other breaking change.
  • Should be a legit fix for some bug, not adding tons of new features.
  • Must either be already audited or not need an audit.
Emergency Bypass

If you really need to bypass this check: add validate: false to each crate
in the Prdoc where a breaking change is introduced. This will release a new major
version of that crate and all its reverse dependencies and basically break the release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A3-backport Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants